Friday, August 29, 2008
THE PHILINE: 7687 MILES
GIZA: THE GOLDEN MARKER;
THE SURVEYOR’S MARKER
THE GOLDEN MILEAGE: 7687
THE PHILINE: 7687 MILES
For several years after I discovered proof of one earth polar shift, I began to suspect that there may be much more to discover. After all, when the Mayans and the Hopi's spoke of the 4th Sun or the 5th Sun, doesn't it seem possible that they were saying that the sun actually traveled a different route in the sky for each differently numbered sun?
The fact that important sites were in a line on the Tropic of Cancer made me wonder if the intelligent beings who set up the Ancient Grid had more surprises if only I could find the key.
What came to mind first was the fact that I had used Giza as a starting point to find the ancient North Pole in much the same way as a surveyor would use a surveyor's marker to relate to the rest of the site he was surveying.
What also came to mind was the fact that so much of the great Pyramid of Giza was mathematical in its dimensions and implications that perhaps mathematics and or measurements were involved on a world wide basis. With this in mind I started looking for such a basis.
Eventually, I decided to purchase a computer program that would give me the exact distances between desired sites. I thought I would be principally measuring distances between "sacred sites" and so, logically, the first two sites to measure the distance between were Giza and Teotihuacan since these are the two most impressive non-natural sites in the world and constantly identified by legitiment archeologists as "sacred sites".
The software program gave the direct mileage between Giza and Teotihuacan as 7687 miles. O.K., so what? What did this number mean if anything? It seemed like any other random meaningless number. I tried to make this number significant by dividing it by the Mayan "13", by the Christian "12", by 365.25. When I divided 7687 by 365.25 I got 21. Now isn't that a sacred number? But I shock myself awake and realized that Giza was Egyptian, not Mayan and that I was beginning to sound like one of those pseudo-Egyptologists who find a different year of somebody's history in the Grand Gallery of Giza.
But since numbers and math concepts seemed to be so important to the builders of Giza, I continued in this vein. Then, in a book by Charles Berlitz, I came across "phi", an Ancient mathematical concept called the "Golden Line" whereby if you multiplied a certain distance by the value of "phi", 1.618…, you would get a new distance where the new total distance is equally proportional to the original length as the original length was to the largest portion of the Golden Line, that is, to .618 of the original length. This largest portion is called the "Golden Segment".
When I tried to find this mathematical concept in modern math books, I could find no reference at all.
Because of the esoteric nature of the "phi" concept and the uniqueness of the number's value I did not expect much, and while I couldn't find an example of this in ancient mythology or pyramid architecture, it sounded impressive so, admittedly, on a whim, I multiplied the measured distance, 7687 miles from Giza to Teotihuacan, by 1.618 and got 12,437 miles which is 1/2 of the distance of the circumference of the earth, exactly.
This discovery stunned me. This could not be a natural phenomenon or an accident. The conclusion I came to was that Giza was located where it was as a deliberate intellectual act that implied a knowledge of the presence and exact location of Teotihuacan. It also implied that of the two sites, the Teotihuacan site, not necessarily the present observable structure, was the older. Why do I say this? Only Giza is aligned to both the present North Pole and the Ancient North Pole.
While Teotihuacan is aligned toward neither, it is on the Tropic of Cancer created when the ancient North Pole is used as a reference.
Teotihuacan is aligned 15.5 degrees north by northeast of the present North Pole and even further off from the Ancient North Pole.
But without going into any ideas that would distract the reader, let me dwell for a moment on the distance between Giza and Teotihaucan: 7687 miles. The fact that this number is such a non-natural calculated amount (one half of the circumference of the earth times the inverse of phi) as opposed to a random or accidental amount plus the fact that Giza is orientated toward two polar sites implies that Giza may not have been so much a "sacred site" as a surveyor's marker or record keeper's informational site. In other words, Giza is the perfect "marker" for geographers, surveyors, travelers, etc., not only in its own day, but also for future seekers of the truth and I therefore called Giza the Golden Marker and the 7687
miles the Golden Mileage for further research.
My next move was to measure between Teotihuacan and Cusco because the Cusco site has such a powerful presence in ancient Peruvian mythology. This mileage was 2936. After multiplying the Golden Mileage by the value of the shorter part of the Golden Line; that is, by .382 (1-.618=.382) I came up with 2936 exactly. The distance from Teotihuacan to Cusco was absolutely related to the Golden Mileage.
After this discovery I was on a measuring frenzy, but never expected what happened next. The distance from Giza to the site of the Nasca Lines was also 7687 exactly. Exactly the same distance as that between Giza and Teotihuacan, and this later measurement created an almost perfect "phi" driven triangle with two equal sides and a base or third side that was 2903 miles long, almost 38.2% of the Golden Mileage.
Also the distance from Mt. Kilaminjaro (the highest mountain in Africa) to the Nasca lines is 7658 miles, very close to the Golden Mileage of 7687.
The distance from Giza to the highest mountain in the center of Australia, Mt. Zeil, is 7637 miles, very close to the Golden Mileage of 7687.
NOTE: When I write about Mt. Zeil, I am really writing about Mt. Zeil and Mt. Liebig(fifty miles apart) in the Macdonnell Range. I use Mt. Zeil as the focus because it is on the Tropic of Capricorn which is also important to my study.
Stop for a moment and think about this number, 7687. Think about its lack of uniqueness until one multiplies half the circumference of the earth, 12,437, by an ancient mathematical concept that few people, even mathematicians, have ever heard about, but a concept that was used in both Egypt and Greece thousands of years ago. This number, 7687, which I call the Golden Mileage, positively connects ancient Giza to the rest of the world, further revealing the fact that highly intelligent and powerful beings not only were in charge of the whole earth, not only created a system to connect what were important sites to them, but also left enough clues so that someone like me would stumble across their pattern of connections.
In the next part of this booklet I will show the reader some of the other amazing measurements that further demonstrate the amazing pattern of connections of what I call the Ancient Earthlords.
After discovering the Golden Mileage of 7687 miles, I continued my research. I found that that other numbers related to the circumference of the earth or I should say 1/2 the circumference of the earth were important in this ancient system:
From Giza to Mt. Fuji is 6229 miles which a very close to the 6222 miles that make up exactly 1/4 of the circumference of the earth.
From Mt. Zeil to the Nasca Lines is 9214 miles. From Mt. Zeil to Teotihuacan is 9130 miles.
From Teotihuacan to Mt. Everest is 9137 miles. These numbers are almost equal to half way half way around the earth at the Tropic of Cancer.
Note: It is also interesting to point out the Mt. Everest and Teotihuacan are almost directly opposite from each other on what was the Tropic of Cancer before the Earth's poles shifted the last time.
From Mt. Zeil to Mt. Tahat (the highest peak in the Haggar mountains of Algeria) is 9088 miles, close to half the circumference of the earth at the Tropic of Cancer. Also note: Both Mt. Zeil and Mt. Tahat are extremely close to tropic lines: Mt. Zeil is on the Tropic of Capricorn and Tahat is on the Tropic of Cancer.
Let's stay with Mt. Zeil for one more set of interesting relationships:
From Mt. Zeil to Kilaminjaro is 6454 miles.
From Mt. Zeil to the mythological site of King Solomon's Mines is 6482. Again we have an almost equal sided triangle.
From Mt. Zeil to Mt. Everest is 4672 miles, but if you multiply this by the number 1.382 (the inverse of the value of the smaller segment of the Golden Segment) the number is 6456. I realize that that 6450-6487 numbers do not seems to fit into any pattern I have so far noted, but I feel strongly they will. For example, in such long distances as 6454, 6482, 6456, it is not too much of a stretch to say that these numbers are very close to the distance, 3233 miles, between the Tropic of Cancer and the Tropic of Capricorn multiplied by 2 (3233 x 2 = 6466).
Note: The ancient King Solomon's Mines were thought to be slightly northwest of Harara, the present capitol of Zimbabwe.
So:
From Giza to King Solomon's Mines is 3258 miles.
From Mt. Tahat to King Solomon's is 3266 miles.
From Giza to Mt. Tahat is 1610 miles.
Again we have a triangle of two equal sides and a base that is half the distance of the two sides with one of the longer sides from Tahat to the Mines running from the present day Tropic of Cancer to a site (the Mines) on the Ancient Tropic of Capricorn, and the other long side running from Giza, a site that is located on the ancient Tropic of Cancer to a site (the Mines) on the ancient Tropic of Capricorn.
NOTE ALSO: King Solomon's Mines were located almost exactly across the earth from Mona Kea in Hawaii. Except for the recognized and constant movement of the Hawaiian Islands due to their tectonic plate movement they might be exactly across.
GUESTION: Would it be possible by calculating plate tectonic movement to tell how long ago they were exactly opposite. This is of special interest because if one could back up that plate movement of the Hawaiian Islands a mere 150 miles then one would note that the Hawaiian Islands had been on the Ancient Tropic of Cancer exactly half way around the world from Giza and would know how long ago they were opposite each other.
Perhaps more intriguing is the possibility that when the poles shifted, some parts of the earth could have subsided: Perhaps there was another Hawaiian Island almost exactly across from Giza and it vanished. In Plato, remember, Atlantis disappeared completely and what was left was an impassable part of the Atlantic, the Sargasso Sea.
More interesting information:
If you lived on the island of Sri Lanka you would know that in their ancient mythology, Adam's Peak is the place where Adam of the Bible first stepped on the earth. This is why it is called Adam's Peak to Christians. It is also interesting to note that this same mountain is where Budha first stepped on the earth, and to go one better than the Christians, the myth of Budha states that Budha also left his footprint there.
From Adam's Peak to King Solomon's Mines is 3820* miles. The Golden Mileage, 7687 miles divided by 2 equals 3843 miles.
MORE about King Solomon's Mines"
I used the city of Chilhoyi, Zimbabwe, northwest of Harara as a marker for measuring the distance to King Solomon's Mines. Perhaps this place is off by 23 miles. Isn't that an interesting idea for archeologists? Perhaps they could triangulate to the exact site, or since the poles actually travel around an "average" spot, and since the spot where the poles are at any one time can be off from this "average" by many miles, my numbers, if "off" by even fifty miles are not off.
Also:
From Teotihuacan to Mt. McKinley is 3843 miles. Multiply this number by two and you have the GOLDEN MILEAGE, 7686. Remember, Mt. McKinley is on a latitude that is almost the same as Hawaii and exactly on the opposite side of the earth from Giza AND King Solomon's Mines.
QUESTION: Is anything in this, casual, natural?
My final interesting discovery was not just in mileage, but in straight lines:
If you fly from Mt. McKinley to Teotihuacan you will fly over Mt. Shasta, the mystical, volcanic mountain.
If you fly from Mt. Shasta to Mt. Aconcagua, the highest mountain in South America, you will fly over Teotihuacan.
If you fly from Mt. Zeil, going east, to Giza, you will fly over the Nasca Lines and then Cusco and with only a slight deviation in your flight, you will fly very close to Mt. Tahat, one of the two highest mountains in the North African Sahara Desert before you arrive back at Giza.
If you fly west from Mt. Zeil to Tahat and continue on a straight line, you will fly over Teotihuacan, and continuing in a straight line, you will arrive back at Mt. Zeil.
If you fly from Mt. Zeil, going west, to Giza, you will fly directly over Adam's Peak.
If you fly from Mt. Fuji to the Nasca Lines, you will fly very "in sight" close to Mauna Loa in Hawaii.
If you start at the Nasca Lines and fly toward Mouna Loa or Mouna Kea and continue straight on you will fly over Adam's Peak on you way back to the Nasca Lines. On this flight you will fly within sight of Kilaminjaro.
If you fly from Tahat to Delhi, you will fly over Giza.
But, to me, the most amazing: If you fly in a very straight line from Mt. Fuji-san, Japans most mystical mountain, toward Mt. Agoncagua, the highest mountain in South America and do not divert you straight flight , you will fly over Mt. Kilaminjaro, which will be almost exactly half way between Fuji and Agoncagua; and, by continuing on straight, you will arrive back at Mt. Fuji. The total distance of this flight is, of course, the exact circumference of the earth. Question: Could these SUPERIOR BEINGS even setup mountains where ever they needed them?
To be able to go from anywhere and fly the full circumference of the earth the first time around demands the finest flight navigation of our modern times, but it seems to me that some beings in the past were just as good at measuring and navigation as our best today.
I started the original research to show only that the poles shifted from a position that allowed certain "sacred" sites to line up on either the Tropic of Cancer or the Tropic of Capricorn, but as I was able to see the patterns clearer, I began to see that what was most important besides Giza and Teotihuacan were not just so-called "sacred sites", but mountains that were significant to their areas and that stood out from the air, and, in several instances, were located in a straight or almost straight line.
Of course, questions arose in my mind. The biggest questions were: Why were distances based on the circumference of the earth, the distance between the tropic lines and the poles, between the north and south tropic lines themselves, and why the straight lines across such vast distances? Why especially, did the Ancient Surveyors use PHI, the Golden Segment? Was someone traveling by air, and were they traveling at such fast speeds that straight lines were important. Or were they sending messages that demanded the straightest lines possible, and did all this happen at a time when the lines were perfectly straight and could we calculate how long ago that was by knowing how fast the various continents shifted?
I could see ancient builders lining up several sacred sites or a couple of sites and a mountain, but to have three or more major mountains or major volcanoes line up is more than interesting. How could that happen? Why did that happen?
An impulsive reaction, admittedly rash, was to conclude that whoever the beings were that could build Teotihuacan or Gaza could also raise volcanic mountains where they desired them to be. Admittedly a rash thought.
It is important to note that despite the measurements I did, I have only just begun to figure out where many important sites are located. For example, I feel that there are many lost sites in the vast Pacific that sunk or were covered by water, since even conservative geologists admit that the water level was at least 600 feet lower and would thus expose thousands of square miles of now lost land.
Let me suggest a location that could give us an ancient living area, even a lost city: That would be at a spot in the South Pacific exactly across the full diameter of the earth from Giza. This place is under water now, but the water is shallow. Its location would be approximately 149 degrees west and thirty degrees south. What makes this location so intriguing is that it would have been on the Tropic of Capricorn in the First Ancient Pole position back. Its location is almost 4600(the Tropic of Cancer to North Pole distance) miles from Aconcagua and almost 4600 miles from Mt.Zeil. This place is under water now, but, most enticing, I repeat, the water is shallow.
In sum, then, what have I shown? In Part 1, I proved that the Earth's poles shifted, but that before they shifted, very intelligent and powerful beings lived on the earth and set up complicated structures and created a complex of gridlines and markers built on standard earth measurements and an ancient mathematical formula, PHI, that included both non-natural sites and mountains.
When I shared this research with friends one of their reactions was that there were so many sacred sites and many mountains in the world that if I choose the right ones, of course I could come up with sites that would fit the mathematical concept of phi, show some relationship to the earth's circumference and be in a straight line.
The reality was, however, that the sites and mountains I finally came up with were famous sites and significant mountains: Lesser mountains and sites did not prove useful. Mt. Ararat, Athens, Stonehinge, Jerusalem, Baghdad did fit any pattern that I could discover.
Here are the sites and mountains:
Mount McKinley is the highest mountain in North America.
Mauna Kea is the highest mountain in the 78,000,000 square mile Pacific Ocean.
Aconcagua is the highest mountain in South America.
Mt. Zeil, and Mt. Leibig are the highest mountains in the greater bulk of Australia west of the Coastal Range. They are about fifty miles apart in the MacDonnell Range and are about the same height. Mt. Zeil is also on the Tropic of Capricorn.
Mt. Kilaminjaro is the highest mountain in Africa.
Fuji-san is the greatest and most sacred mountain in Japan.
Adams Peak is one of the highest mountains in Sri Lanka but most important, it is the mountain where both Buddha and Adam were supposed to have first stepped on the earth.
The Nasca Lines of Peru, which can be seen properly only from the air have become one of South America's great mysteries. Up to now their purpose seemed to have something to do with the solar calendar. I now believe that they served as markers, directional indicators, for the beings who were flying above them.
Teotihuacan: One of the greatest non-natural complex of structures even built in the world of those structures that were built before the last polar shift: I believe that there were at least two previous polar shifts or "suns" and that one of Teotihuacan"s purposes was to point to a previous polar position, and, as such, Teotihuacan is a marker for that previous pole. I also believe now that the site where Teotihuacan was built and the orientation of what we now see there, is as important as what was built there.
If one combines the fact that Teotihucan is off true north by 15.5 degrees NNE with the distance of the Tropic of Cancer to the North Pole, one arrives at a polar position near the east coast of Greenland at about 30 degrees west longitude and 75 degrees north latitude. If one then draws a Tropic of Cancer arc around the earth for this ancient polar position, two important sites are intersected: Delhi and the pyramids of China. It is also interesting to note that Mecca is also on this arc.
Drawing a Tropic of Capricorn arch from the South Pole of this ancient polar situation, the arch intersects Easter Island (again) and the middle of the Society Islands. Remember that my own suspicion is that one of the places where an important ancient city will be found is under the water in the Society Islands, and I have already given the location of this city to-be-found at 149 degrees west by 30 degrees south on our present day globe.
Note to myself: Is this location in the Society Islands the same as the one directly across the world from Giza? Is the following true?
1. Zeil is 4600 miles from this ancient polar position and
2. Aconcagua is 4600 miles form this ancient polar position? Yes.
3. Does the 149 degree West by 30 South location 4600 miles from Aconcagua and Zeil creat two equilateral triangles? Yes.
RESTATEMENT: Concepts included in my copyrighted 1992 booklet GRIDLINES OF THE ANCIENT EARTHLORDS
1. When I moved the Tropic of Cancer to Giza, several famous "sacred sites" lined up of the Tropic of Cancer. (This was in my first booklet.)
2. In order for non-natural human sites to line up on the same latitudinal line around the the earth, a sphere, non-natural or intelligent beings had to do it and had to have control over the whole earth.
NEW IDEAS TO CONSIDER:
1. Giza and Teotihuacan are 7687 miles apart. This number has no significance what so ever until it is multiplied by 1.618, an ancient Egyptian and Greek mathematical concept. The product of 7687 X 1.618 is 12, 437 miles exactly, which immediately implies that the number is an intelligently, that is, non-naturally, calculated number derived by intelligent beings.
2. These beings were so exactly aware of other sites that Giza's main purpose was that of a super durable marker for locating the other sites.
3. These intelligent beings built a SYSTEM of connectivity not so much in a grid pattern of common degrees (such as 30 degres, 45 degrees, etc.), but a system that used distances relative to the earth's circumference, to the distance between the Tropics, to the distance from the Tropics to the earth's poles, to the Egyptian/Greek "phi", by triangulation, and by impressive natural sites in a straight line.
4. Added to the straight lines is the very obvious use of the Nasca Lines site as a convergence point, and/or I believe, a re-routing area for whatever the "connectivity" involved needed to be complete.
5. The Mt. Zeil/Mt.Liebig area of the Macdonnell Range of Australia: A real surprise for me. The fact that the distance from Mt. Leibig to Giza was the GOLDEN MILEAGE, 7687 miles exactly was especially startling to me. The idea that these two mountains were a duo and that the distances to many other important sites used "standard" mileages indicated to me that this part of the world was very important in the ancient times; so important as to be considered part of the center of ancient civilization. Mythological Lemuria, perhaps.
6. It is also very important to note that only recently has a very, very gigantic meteor site in this area of Australia been recognized for what it is and it is very possible that this meteor could have been responsible for end of civilization at that time in that part of the world.
Some semi-final thoughts for the moment:
If this research seemed boring because of so much measurable data, it was because I wanted the reader to realize that the data is real and can be redone by the reader. Yes, you, the reader, can drop a plum line from the apex of the Pyramid of Giza to its base to create two right angled triangles. Then you can divide the base of one of those triangles by the hypotenuse of that triangle to arrive at the value of PHI.
This was written and copyrighted in 2002. So much more has been discovered. For example I have discovered that Nasca was located almost exactly across(antipodal) to the equally mysterious Angkor Wat. They would be exactly across from each other if the coast line of South America had not shifted ninty or so miles east! Amazing stuff., but the greatest and most certain realization if that HUMANS DID NOT DO THIS. It required SUPERIOR BEINGS.
Stanley Meylor
Copyrighted, 2002
Present date: August 29,2008
THE SURVEYOR’S MARKER
THE GOLDEN MILEAGE: 7687
THE PHILINE: 7687 MILES
For several years after I discovered proof of one earth polar shift, I began to suspect that there may be much more to discover. After all, when the Mayans and the Hopi's spoke of the 4th Sun or the 5th Sun, doesn't it seem possible that they were saying that the sun actually traveled a different route in the sky for each differently numbered sun?
The fact that important sites were in a line on the Tropic of Cancer made me wonder if the intelligent beings who set up the Ancient Grid had more surprises if only I could find the key.
What came to mind first was the fact that I had used Giza as a starting point to find the ancient North Pole in much the same way as a surveyor would use a surveyor's marker to relate to the rest of the site he was surveying.
What also came to mind was the fact that so much of the great Pyramid of Giza was mathematical in its dimensions and implications that perhaps mathematics and or measurements were involved on a world wide basis. With this in mind I started looking for such a basis.
Eventually, I decided to purchase a computer program that would give me the exact distances between desired sites. I thought I would be principally measuring distances between "sacred sites" and so, logically, the first two sites to measure the distance between were Giza and Teotihuacan since these are the two most impressive non-natural sites in the world and constantly identified by legitiment archeologists as "sacred sites".
The software program gave the direct mileage between Giza and Teotihuacan as 7687 miles. O.K., so what? What did this number mean if anything? It seemed like any other random meaningless number. I tried to make this number significant by dividing it by the Mayan "13", by the Christian "12", by 365.25. When I divided 7687 by 365.25 I got 21. Now isn't that a sacred number? But I shock myself awake and realized that Giza was Egyptian, not Mayan and that I was beginning to sound like one of those pseudo-Egyptologists who find a different year of somebody's history in the Grand Gallery of Giza.
But since numbers and math concepts seemed to be so important to the builders of Giza, I continued in this vein. Then, in a book by Charles Berlitz, I came across "phi", an Ancient mathematical concept called the "Golden Line" whereby if you multiplied a certain distance by the value of "phi", 1.618…, you would get a new distance where the new total distance is equally proportional to the original length as the original length was to the largest portion of the Golden Line, that is, to .618 of the original length. This largest portion is called the "Golden Segment".
When I tried to find this mathematical concept in modern math books, I could find no reference at all.
Because of the esoteric nature of the "phi" concept and the uniqueness of the number's value I did not expect much, and while I couldn't find an example of this in ancient mythology or pyramid architecture, it sounded impressive so, admittedly, on a whim, I multiplied the measured distance, 7687 miles from Giza to Teotihuacan, by 1.618 and got 12,437 miles which is 1/2 of the distance of the circumference of the earth, exactly.
This discovery stunned me. This could not be a natural phenomenon or an accident. The conclusion I came to was that Giza was located where it was as a deliberate intellectual act that implied a knowledge of the presence and exact location of Teotihuacan. It also implied that of the two sites, the Teotihuacan site, not necessarily the present observable structure, was the older. Why do I say this? Only Giza is aligned to both the present North Pole and the Ancient North Pole.
While Teotihuacan is aligned toward neither, it is on the Tropic of Cancer created when the ancient North Pole is used as a reference.
Teotihuacan is aligned 15.5 degrees north by northeast of the present North Pole and even further off from the Ancient North Pole.
But without going into any ideas that would distract the reader, let me dwell for a moment on the distance between Giza and Teotihaucan: 7687 miles. The fact that this number is such a non-natural calculated amount (one half of the circumference of the earth times the inverse of phi) as opposed to a random or accidental amount plus the fact that Giza is orientated toward two polar sites implies that Giza may not have been so much a "sacred site" as a surveyor's marker or record keeper's informational site. In other words, Giza is the perfect "marker" for geographers, surveyors, travelers, etc., not only in its own day, but also for future seekers of the truth and I therefore called Giza the Golden Marker and the 7687
miles the Golden Mileage for further research.
My next move was to measure between Teotihuacan and Cusco because the Cusco site has such a powerful presence in ancient Peruvian mythology. This mileage was 2936. After multiplying the Golden Mileage by the value of the shorter part of the Golden Line; that is, by .382 (1-.618=.382) I came up with 2936 exactly. The distance from Teotihuacan to Cusco was absolutely related to the Golden Mileage.
After this discovery I was on a measuring frenzy, but never expected what happened next. The distance from Giza to the site of the Nasca Lines was also 7687 exactly. Exactly the same distance as that between Giza and Teotihuacan, and this later measurement created an almost perfect "phi" driven triangle with two equal sides and a base or third side that was 2903 miles long, almost 38.2% of the Golden Mileage.
Also the distance from Mt. Kilaminjaro (the highest mountain in Africa) to the Nasca lines is 7658 miles, very close to the Golden Mileage of 7687.
The distance from Giza to the highest mountain in the center of Australia, Mt. Zeil, is 7637 miles, very close to the Golden Mileage of 7687.
NOTE: When I write about Mt. Zeil, I am really writing about Mt. Zeil and Mt. Liebig(fifty miles apart) in the Macdonnell Range. I use Mt. Zeil as the focus because it is on the Tropic of Capricorn which is also important to my study.
Stop for a moment and think about this number, 7687. Think about its lack of uniqueness until one multiplies half the circumference of the earth, 12,437, by an ancient mathematical concept that few people, even mathematicians, have ever heard about, but a concept that was used in both Egypt and Greece thousands of years ago. This number, 7687, which I call the Golden Mileage, positively connects ancient Giza to the rest of the world, further revealing the fact that highly intelligent and powerful beings not only were in charge of the whole earth, not only created a system to connect what were important sites to them, but also left enough clues so that someone like me would stumble across their pattern of connections.
In the next part of this booklet I will show the reader some of the other amazing measurements that further demonstrate the amazing pattern of connections of what I call the Ancient Earthlords.
After discovering the Golden Mileage of 7687 miles, I continued my research. I found that that other numbers related to the circumference of the earth or I should say 1/2 the circumference of the earth were important in this ancient system:
From Giza to Mt. Fuji is 6229 miles which a very close to the 6222 miles that make up exactly 1/4 of the circumference of the earth.
From Mt. Zeil to the Nasca Lines is 9214 miles. From Mt. Zeil to Teotihuacan is 9130 miles.
From Teotihuacan to Mt. Everest is 9137 miles. These numbers are almost equal to half way half way around the earth at the Tropic of Cancer.
Note: It is also interesting to point out the Mt. Everest and Teotihuacan are almost directly opposite from each other on what was the Tropic of Cancer before the Earth's poles shifted the last time.
From Mt. Zeil to Mt. Tahat (the highest peak in the Haggar mountains of Algeria) is 9088 miles, close to half the circumference of the earth at the Tropic of Cancer. Also note: Both Mt. Zeil and Mt. Tahat are extremely close to tropic lines: Mt. Zeil is on the Tropic of Capricorn and Tahat is on the Tropic of Cancer.
Let's stay with Mt. Zeil for one more set of interesting relationships:
From Mt. Zeil to Kilaminjaro is 6454 miles.
From Mt. Zeil to the mythological site of King Solomon's Mines is 6482. Again we have an almost equal sided triangle.
From Mt. Zeil to Mt. Everest is 4672 miles, but if you multiply this by the number 1.382 (the inverse of the value of the smaller segment of the Golden Segment) the number is 6456. I realize that that 6450-6487 numbers do not seems to fit into any pattern I have so far noted, but I feel strongly they will. For example, in such long distances as 6454, 6482, 6456, it is not too much of a stretch to say that these numbers are very close to the distance, 3233 miles, between the Tropic of Cancer and the Tropic of Capricorn multiplied by 2 (3233 x 2 = 6466).
Note: The ancient King Solomon's Mines were thought to be slightly northwest of Harara, the present capitol of Zimbabwe.
So:
From Giza to King Solomon's Mines is 3258 miles.
From Mt. Tahat to King Solomon's is 3266 miles.
From Giza to Mt. Tahat is 1610 miles.
Again we have a triangle of two equal sides and a base that is half the distance of the two sides with one of the longer sides from Tahat to the Mines running from the present day Tropic of Cancer to a site (the Mines) on the Ancient Tropic of Capricorn, and the other long side running from Giza, a site that is located on the ancient Tropic of Cancer to a site (the Mines) on the ancient Tropic of Capricorn.
NOTE ALSO: King Solomon's Mines were located almost exactly across the earth from Mona Kea in Hawaii. Except for the recognized and constant movement of the Hawaiian Islands due to their tectonic plate movement they might be exactly across.
GUESTION: Would it be possible by calculating plate tectonic movement to tell how long ago they were exactly opposite. This is of special interest because if one could back up that plate movement of the Hawaiian Islands a mere 150 miles then one would note that the Hawaiian Islands had been on the Ancient Tropic of Cancer exactly half way around the world from Giza and would know how long ago they were opposite each other.
Perhaps more intriguing is the possibility that when the poles shifted, some parts of the earth could have subsided: Perhaps there was another Hawaiian Island almost exactly across from Giza and it vanished. In Plato, remember, Atlantis disappeared completely and what was left was an impassable part of the Atlantic, the Sargasso Sea.
More interesting information:
If you lived on the island of Sri Lanka you would know that in their ancient mythology, Adam's Peak is the place where Adam of the Bible first stepped on the earth. This is why it is called Adam's Peak to Christians. It is also interesting to note that this same mountain is where Budha first stepped on the earth, and to go one better than the Christians, the myth of Budha states that Budha also left his footprint there.
From Adam's Peak to King Solomon's Mines is 3820* miles. The Golden Mileage, 7687 miles divided by 2 equals 3843 miles.
MORE about King Solomon's Mines"
I used the city of Chilhoyi, Zimbabwe, northwest of Harara as a marker for measuring the distance to King Solomon's Mines. Perhaps this place is off by 23 miles. Isn't that an interesting idea for archeologists? Perhaps they could triangulate to the exact site, or since the poles actually travel around an "average" spot, and since the spot where the poles are at any one time can be off from this "average" by many miles, my numbers, if "off" by even fifty miles are not off.
Also:
From Teotihuacan to Mt. McKinley is 3843 miles. Multiply this number by two and you have the GOLDEN MILEAGE, 7686. Remember, Mt. McKinley is on a latitude that is almost the same as Hawaii and exactly on the opposite side of the earth from Giza AND King Solomon's Mines.
QUESTION: Is anything in this, casual, natural?
My final interesting discovery was not just in mileage, but in straight lines:
If you fly from Mt. McKinley to Teotihuacan you will fly over Mt. Shasta, the mystical, volcanic mountain.
If you fly from Mt. Shasta to Mt. Aconcagua, the highest mountain in South America, you will fly over Teotihuacan.
If you fly from Mt. Zeil, going east, to Giza, you will fly over the Nasca Lines and then Cusco and with only a slight deviation in your flight, you will fly very close to Mt. Tahat, one of the two highest mountains in the North African Sahara Desert before you arrive back at Giza.
If you fly west from Mt. Zeil to Tahat and continue on a straight line, you will fly over Teotihuacan, and continuing in a straight line, you will arrive back at Mt. Zeil.
If you fly from Mt. Zeil, going west, to Giza, you will fly directly over Adam's Peak.
If you fly from Mt. Fuji to the Nasca Lines, you will fly very "in sight" close to Mauna Loa in Hawaii.
If you start at the Nasca Lines and fly toward Mouna Loa or Mouna Kea and continue straight on you will fly over Adam's Peak on you way back to the Nasca Lines. On this flight you will fly within sight of Kilaminjaro.
If you fly from Tahat to Delhi, you will fly over Giza.
But, to me, the most amazing: If you fly in a very straight line from Mt. Fuji-san, Japans most mystical mountain, toward Mt. Agoncagua, the highest mountain in South America and do not divert you straight flight , you will fly over Mt. Kilaminjaro, which will be almost exactly half way between Fuji and Agoncagua; and, by continuing on straight, you will arrive back at Mt. Fuji. The total distance of this flight is, of course, the exact circumference of the earth. Question: Could these SUPERIOR BEINGS even setup mountains where ever they needed them?
To be able to go from anywhere and fly the full circumference of the earth the first time around demands the finest flight navigation of our modern times, but it seems to me that some beings in the past were just as good at measuring and navigation as our best today.
I started the original research to show only that the poles shifted from a position that allowed certain "sacred" sites to line up on either the Tropic of Cancer or the Tropic of Capricorn, but as I was able to see the patterns clearer, I began to see that what was most important besides Giza and Teotihuacan were not just so-called "sacred sites", but mountains that were significant to their areas and that stood out from the air, and, in several instances, were located in a straight or almost straight line.
Of course, questions arose in my mind. The biggest questions were: Why were distances based on the circumference of the earth, the distance between the tropic lines and the poles, between the north and south tropic lines themselves, and why the straight lines across such vast distances? Why especially, did the Ancient Surveyors use PHI, the Golden Segment? Was someone traveling by air, and were they traveling at such fast speeds that straight lines were important. Or were they sending messages that demanded the straightest lines possible, and did all this happen at a time when the lines were perfectly straight and could we calculate how long ago that was by knowing how fast the various continents shifted?
I could see ancient builders lining up several sacred sites or a couple of sites and a mountain, but to have three or more major mountains or major volcanoes line up is more than interesting. How could that happen? Why did that happen?
An impulsive reaction, admittedly rash, was to conclude that whoever the beings were that could build Teotihuacan or Gaza could also raise volcanic mountains where they desired them to be. Admittedly a rash thought.
It is important to note that despite the measurements I did, I have only just begun to figure out where many important sites are located. For example, I feel that there are many lost sites in the vast Pacific that sunk or were covered by water, since even conservative geologists admit that the water level was at least 600 feet lower and would thus expose thousands of square miles of now lost land.
Let me suggest a location that could give us an ancient living area, even a lost city: That would be at a spot in the South Pacific exactly across the full diameter of the earth from Giza. This place is under water now, but the water is shallow. Its location would be approximately 149 degrees west and thirty degrees south. What makes this location so intriguing is that it would have been on the Tropic of Capricorn in the First Ancient Pole position back. Its location is almost 4600(the Tropic of Cancer to North Pole distance) miles from Aconcagua and almost 4600 miles from Mt.Zeil. This place is under water now, but, most enticing, I repeat, the water is shallow.
In sum, then, what have I shown? In Part 1, I proved that the Earth's poles shifted, but that before they shifted, very intelligent and powerful beings lived on the earth and set up complicated structures and created a complex of gridlines and markers built on standard earth measurements and an ancient mathematical formula, PHI, that included both non-natural sites and mountains.
When I shared this research with friends one of their reactions was that there were so many sacred sites and many mountains in the world that if I choose the right ones, of course I could come up with sites that would fit the mathematical concept of phi, show some relationship to the earth's circumference and be in a straight line.
The reality was, however, that the sites and mountains I finally came up with were famous sites and significant mountains: Lesser mountains and sites did not prove useful. Mt. Ararat, Athens, Stonehinge, Jerusalem, Baghdad did fit any pattern that I could discover.
Here are the sites and mountains:
Mount McKinley is the highest mountain in North America.
Mauna Kea is the highest mountain in the 78,000,000 square mile Pacific Ocean.
Aconcagua is the highest mountain in South America.
Mt. Zeil, and Mt. Leibig are the highest mountains in the greater bulk of Australia west of the Coastal Range. They are about fifty miles apart in the MacDonnell Range and are about the same height. Mt. Zeil is also on the Tropic of Capricorn.
Mt. Kilaminjaro is the highest mountain in Africa.
Fuji-san is the greatest and most sacred mountain in Japan.
Adams Peak is one of the highest mountains in Sri Lanka but most important, it is the mountain where both Buddha and Adam were supposed to have first stepped on the earth.
The Nasca Lines of Peru, which can be seen properly only from the air have become one of South America's great mysteries. Up to now their purpose seemed to have something to do with the solar calendar. I now believe that they served as markers, directional indicators, for the beings who were flying above them.
Teotihuacan: One of the greatest non-natural complex of structures even built in the world of those structures that were built before the last polar shift: I believe that there were at least two previous polar shifts or "suns" and that one of Teotihuacan"s purposes was to point to a previous polar position, and, as such, Teotihuacan is a marker for that previous pole. I also believe now that the site where Teotihuacan was built and the orientation of what we now see there, is as important as what was built there.
If one combines the fact that Teotihucan is off true north by 15.5 degrees NNE with the distance of the Tropic of Cancer to the North Pole, one arrives at a polar position near the east coast of Greenland at about 30 degrees west longitude and 75 degrees north latitude. If one then draws a Tropic of Cancer arc around the earth for this ancient polar position, two important sites are intersected: Delhi and the pyramids of China. It is also interesting to note that Mecca is also on this arc.
Drawing a Tropic of Capricorn arch from the South Pole of this ancient polar situation, the arch intersects Easter Island (again) and the middle of the Society Islands. Remember that my own suspicion is that one of the places where an important ancient city will be found is under the water in the Society Islands, and I have already given the location of this city to-be-found at 149 degrees west by 30 degrees south on our present day globe.
Note to myself: Is this location in the Society Islands the same as the one directly across the world from Giza? Is the following true?
1. Zeil is 4600 miles from this ancient polar position and
2. Aconcagua is 4600 miles form this ancient polar position? Yes.
3. Does the 149 degree West by 30 South location 4600 miles from Aconcagua and Zeil creat two equilateral triangles? Yes.
RESTATEMENT: Concepts included in my copyrighted 1992 booklet GRIDLINES OF THE ANCIENT EARTHLORDS
1. When I moved the Tropic of Cancer to Giza, several famous "sacred sites" lined up of the Tropic of Cancer. (This was in my first booklet.)
2. In order for non-natural human sites to line up on the same latitudinal line around the the earth, a sphere, non-natural or intelligent beings had to do it and had to have control over the whole earth.
NEW IDEAS TO CONSIDER:
1. Giza and Teotihuacan are 7687 miles apart. This number has no significance what so ever until it is multiplied by 1.618, an ancient Egyptian and Greek mathematical concept. The product of 7687 X 1.618 is 12, 437 miles exactly, which immediately implies that the number is an intelligently, that is, non-naturally, calculated number derived by intelligent beings.
2. These beings were so exactly aware of other sites that Giza's main purpose was that of a super durable marker for locating the other sites.
3. These intelligent beings built a SYSTEM of connectivity not so much in a grid pattern of common degrees (such as 30 degres, 45 degrees, etc.), but a system that used distances relative to the earth's circumference, to the distance between the Tropics, to the distance from the Tropics to the earth's poles, to the Egyptian/Greek "phi", by triangulation, and by impressive natural sites in a straight line.
4. Added to the straight lines is the very obvious use of the Nasca Lines site as a convergence point, and/or I believe, a re-routing area for whatever the "connectivity" involved needed to be complete.
5. The Mt. Zeil/Mt.Liebig area of the Macdonnell Range of Australia: A real surprise for me. The fact that the distance from Mt. Leibig to Giza was the GOLDEN MILEAGE, 7687 miles exactly was especially startling to me. The idea that these two mountains were a duo and that the distances to many other important sites used "standard" mileages indicated to me that this part of the world was very important in the ancient times; so important as to be considered part of the center of ancient civilization. Mythological Lemuria, perhaps.
6. It is also very important to note that only recently has a very, very gigantic meteor site in this area of Australia been recognized for what it is and it is very possible that this meteor could have been responsible for end of civilization at that time in that part of the world.
Some semi-final thoughts for the moment:
If this research seemed boring because of so much measurable data, it was because I wanted the reader to realize that the data is real and can be redone by the reader. Yes, you, the reader, can drop a plum line from the apex of the Pyramid of Giza to its base to create two right angled triangles. Then you can divide the base of one of those triangles by the hypotenuse of that triangle to arrive at the value of PHI.
This was written and copyrighted in 2002. So much more has been discovered. For example I have discovered that Nasca was located almost exactly across(antipodal) to the equally mysterious Angkor Wat. They would be exactly across from each other if the coast line of South America had not shifted ninty or so miles east! Amazing stuff., but the greatest and most certain realization if that HUMANS DID NOT DO THIS. It required SUPERIOR BEINGS.
Stanley Meylor
Copyrighted, 2002
Present date: August 29,2008
